What a gold mine of art and information. Thanks for sharing this one.

Sweet! A few of his political cartoon work was in the Complete Calvin & Hobbes set, but the rest is a real sight to see!

I heard a rumor that he might go public with a new comic someday, but a rumor is a rumor.

God damn, the guy knew how to work a brush.

Awesome finds :)

There are geniuses, and then there’s Bill Watterson. Astonishing skill right from the very start.

I love this man’s work. It is almost painful how much I identify myself with Calvin…

Pity we never had the chance of a Calvin & Hobbes animated cartoon. But I understand his reasons for it.

He is a true artist. His brush work is truly amazing.

I hope Bill returns soon. I always hoped he would have kept C&H alive in comic books.

In today’s world, change that “twenty one” to “forty” and he’d be dead on.

If he was this good at 21 one i couldn’t even imagine how great his ink work is now. It’s too bad he became a recluse.

This was a really good find. I learned how to read and draw thanks to C&H comics, oh and my father too. I remember writing a letter to Bill Watterson when I was much younger asking him if he could teach how to draw and whether or not he would make more C&H comics. To my surprise he wrote back, months later of course. I lost the letter but there’s two things I will always remember: “Keep drawing, practice makes perfect” an a quick drawing of Hobbes with Watterson’s signature. Sometimes I wondered if it was really Bill Watterson that wrote that letter.

“If he was this good at 21 one i couldn’t even imagine how great his ink work is now. It’s too bad he became a recluse.”

Well HH, from what I’ve read through scattered info all over the net, Watterson is focused now on painting oil landscapes of forests with his father. So if he could make such an awesome use of ink for a daily strip, undoubtedly his work now would probably deserve to be exhibited in any museum, if we’re lucky to ever see it. Maybe that won’t happen, partly because nowadays “serious” art is supposed to be all about abstract and portraying nature is considered rather “quaint”. Not that Watterson ever gave a rat’s ass about modern trends. That’s why Calvin was NEVER shown playing video games for example.

> I remember writing a letter to Bill Watterson when I was much younger asking him if he could teach how to draw and whether or not he would make more C&H comics. To my surprise he wrote back, months later of course. I lost the letter but there’s two things I will always remember: “Keep drawing, practice makes perfect� an a quick drawing of Hobbes with Watterson’s signature. Sometimes I wondered if it was really Bill Watterson that wrote that letter.

Glad to see you’ve started questioning authority through that experience! (sorry if I sounded sarcastic there)

Sarah, I’d be willing to bet the letter was genuine. Watterson was a solo act; writing, drawing, inking and lettering his entire ouput. He had nothing but contempt for the likes of Jim Davis, who basically did nothing but sign the work of his small army of assistants.

> He had nothing but contempt for the likes of Jim Davis, who basically did nothing but sign the work of his small army of assistants.

I’ve never quite understood why Jim Davis is invariably singled out for his reliance on assistants in producing his comic strip. Fact is, artists who do it all on their own, such as Waterson and Charles Schulz, are genuine rarities. Most successful comic strips may have just one signature on them, but there are almost invariably other folks functioning in the background, to a greater or lesser degree, and as the years go by, those assistants have a tendency to take on more and more of the responsibility for producing the strip. That’s why, when the artist of a long-running strip dies, the strip almost invariably continues without a hitch. The “new” artist is generally the same person who’s been drawing the strip over the last few years, anyway.

These are genius!!! Bill Watterson, where have you gone?

INTRUIGED that there is a strong possibility that there are bogus WATTERSON ‘originals’ out there……is this the only way these losers can earn a few bucks out of cartooning?—They obviously can’t come up with anything good on their own………WATTERSON often played down his abilities as a political satirist, but his work had ‘bite’ enough, in my eyes.

>INTRUIGED that there is a strong possibility that there are bogus WATTERSON ‘originals’ out there……is this the only way these losers can earn a few bucks out of cartooning?—They obviously can’t come up with anything good on their own………WATTERSON often played down his abilities as a political satirist, but his work had ‘bite’ enough, in my eyes.

Wow, you’re not kidding. C&H could be edgier than Doonsbury on a good day. Remember the one where Calvin asks Mrs. Wormwood if he’s allowed to express his religious faith in a public school -i.e. “Strip down, smear myself with paste and set fire to this little effigy of you….in a very non-denominational sort of way”? Holy shinola. I am completely stunned that such a strip made it to press. It practically makes the “Man’s Best Friend” episode of Ren & Stimpy look like the G - rated fare that it was supposed to be.