Comments on: Tangled?

By: TishTash

TishTash — Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:33:13 +0000

I’m far from a Disney apologist by all means, but seeing the snide, supercilious, arrogant, holier-than-thou comments in this thread for a movie that turned out to be, well, quite good, I can see that it’s not just the KKK and neo-Nazis that have prejudicial proclivities. Apparently, animation fiends do as well, and in spades.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 22 Jan 2011 14:41:59 +0000

Despite all these negative opinions, Tangled turns out to be a “VERY GOOD” movie. This just proves the fact how you shouldn’t judge a book by it’s cover. Come on, MOCK ME. I dare you. But once you watch the movie, you know I’m right. :P

By: Jessie Nicole

Jessie Nicole — Mon, 31 May 2010 20:39:12 +0000

I think they should use `Tangled`as a sub-name, kind of like Pirates of the Caribbean: the Black Pearl, that way people would know that there is more to the story then just `Rapunzel,Rapunzel let down your hair`, but at the same time i keeps it`s fairy tale roots and in addition is also respectful to Walt Disney and the Grimm Brothers, like it could be something like `Rapunzel: the tangled years` or `Rapunzel: A tangled tale of epic proportions` or `Rapunzel: prepared to get tangled`

the options are endless, and in my opinion it`s a very ideal compromise.

By: eeedel

eeedel — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:36:39 +0000

Whatever happened to those AMAZING screen grabs or whatever from a few years ago where they were going to try and mimic a “realistic” painterly style for this movie??

Non artists shouldn’t be in charge of making art-specific decisions.

By: Jeff Polizzi

Jeff Polizzi — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:32:59 +0000

I find that title, “Tangled,” disrespectful to not only the Grimm Brother’s title, but to Walt Disney as well. Because that is not what Walt Disney would do when he adapts fairy tales into animated movies. Those people, who complain about story titles being too girlish, need to understand that those story titles being too girlish happens to be written by MEN before we are even born. Also, they need to understand that they do not write stories just for girls or boys, they write for families to enjoy, learn, and love. I even love the title logo that Disney created for “Rapunzel,” and now they want to change it to “Tangled?” That title does not make any sense, and it is misleading. If they ever do change the title from “Rapunzel” to “Tangled,” I would find Disney’s next CG movie a flop. But, if they leave the title, “Rapunzel,” the way it is, and the title logo that Disney created, then I would have high confidence that Disney’s next CG movie could be a huge success. So I say to Disney, “I demand that you change that dreadful title back to “Rapunzel” at once, or else you will all become a disgrace to Walt Disney forever. And you will fall to DreamWorks Animation forever more.”

By: ROn

ROn — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:59:10 +0000

I’m quite sure THIs is the best Rapunzel take:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-fK8rYa45Q

By: Graham

Graham — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:31:07 +0000

The title reminds me of Hoodwinked. It’s also a fresh take on an old fairy tale.

Sound familiar?

By: Chris powell

Chris powell — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:44:16 +0000

I might have missed it but: Is Glen Keane still directing this?