brewmasters
JERRY BECK
bio & contact
view posts by jerry
AMID AMIDI
bio & contact
view posts by amid
John K. Analyzes The Hep Cat (1942)
by amid
February 25, 2008 8:29 am


Hep cat

John Kricfalusi’s visual analysis of Bob Clampett’s The Hep Cat offers interesting ideas about why this particular cartoon works so well:

“It’s not Clampett’s funniest cartoon, although it is pretty funny. It doesn’t have any star characters in it. What makes it stand out, then? This cartoon is a mood piece. It’s an experiment in atmosphere and emotion…I think the best cartoons revel in goofiness and achieve a kind of gorgeous beauty not attainable in any other medium. Clampett takes the wacky surrealism natural to cartoons and places it in a lush atmosphere.”

02/25/08  9:27am

Lookie! I can use the IMDB to prove points too!

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v91/looneythad/IMDB.jpg

Tit for tat.

02/25/08  9:52am
Matt Sullivan says:

Oh great. Just what we need. Another lecture by John “know-it-all” K. His constant bashing of CalArts students is a major irritation to me.

Also, I’m one of the very few people who think the cartoons of the 1940’s, while entertaining, weren’t very creative OR entertaining.

02/25/08  11:09am

Also, I’m one of the very few people who think the cartoons of the 1940’s, while entertaining, weren’t very creative OR entertaining.

Make up your mind.

02/25/08  11:25am
uffler mustek says:

“Also, I’m one of the very few people who think the cartoons of the 1940’s, while entertaining, weren’t very creative OR entertaining.”

Classic. You blew it dude.

02/25/08  11:31am
Bob says:

Nobody did lousy work in the 1940’s. Today nearly everyone is forced to do lousy work due to no budgets and corporate idiocy.

02/25/08  12:08pm

Does anyone know if the colors in the image are the same as those from the original short? If so, it’s pretty poor color choice. You can’t really see the black cat’s body against the sky, and that branch on the right could almost pass for an arm or something. I didn’t read the analysis of the cartoon to see if the coloration has been mentioned.

02/25/08  1:03pm
PCUnfunny says:

“Also, I’m one of the very few people who think the cartoons of the 1940’s, while entertaining, weren’t very creative OR entertaining.”

I feel the same way. The 1940’s cartoons weren’t entertaining at all. They were just entertaining.

Anyway, I like John K.’s analysis of this cartoon. The Hep Cat had a Saturday night on the town type atmosphere which makes it enjoyable. A cat just wanting to have a good time and probably get some.

02/25/08  1:06pm
PCUnfunny says:

Bishop: I don’t agree on your POV. Everything in the screenshot is perfectly defined. I have no trouble seeing the cat’s body or the branch the bird is on.

02/25/08  1:31pm

The colors on this cartoon looked much better on the laserdisc release.

02/25/08  1:32pm
Vincent says:

FB it might be a monitor issue. Im seeing a clear silhouette on my screen.
Otherwise I found this article to be yet another informative read.

02/25/08  2:22pm

I love 1940’s cartoons, especially Warners & MGM.

02/25/08  3:05pm

It must be a monitor issue then. The cat’s right ear (on our left) is pretty much invisible.

02/25/08  3:47pm
A.M.Bush says:

Floyd, I agree that the colors in the cartoon are a little too dark and muted for my taste, but in the actual animation the blue is not as dark as it appears in the screenshot.

02/25/08  5:04pm
Brian D. Scott says:

This is one of my favorites from that time, along with Back Alley Oproar and Hush My Mouse.

02/25/08  5:16pm
Matt Sullivan says:

As I tried to write earlier, I meant to write “Amusing”, not entertaining. ( which for some reason, that comment wasn’t approved )It was a brain fart.

And, by amusing, I meant in a visual manner. They looked very funny, but I just didn’t find them as entertaining as other animated programs.

02/25/08  5:37pm
GeeVee says:

40’s Cartoons are superior.

One reason I assert this is that you’d have a very hard time making a cartoon that looks like these ever again. Most would aim at the slapstick elements and give it an abundant homage flavor, like Roger Rabbit. But that unrelenting hyperactivity is not the true soul of these cartoons, when it comes down to the subtle blend of 40s culture, music and voices

To pick apart and fault some color issues completely obfuscates the overall comedic effect of the work. I’d rather stick with work that hasn’t been so over-analyzed that it becomes perfect-ly stale. This is an art that you SET IN MOTION and the great thing about cartoons of the era is that they have a tight relationship to music and jazz. They are distinctly musical. They just had all the right elements going in an unconstrained, freewheeling way. That’s the miracle right there.

Oh and they were funny in a way Disney couldn’t touch (although I still love Disney for completely different reasons —It doesn’t have to be a contest for supremecy).

02/25/08  9:35pm

Clampett’s one-shots like this were great because the characters were so memorable, even if they never appeared again. This cartoon is better and more fun than any cartoon John K. has ever done.

02/26/08  12:27am
Norty says:

Swing music hit its lively peak from about 1940-45. Gee Vee’s words about music intertwining with animation of the day make sense.

02/26/08  7:30am

“Swing music hit its lively peak from about 1940-45. Gee Vee’s words about music intertwining with animation of the day make sense”

Plus Carl Stalling & Scott Bradley were on top of their games in the 1940’s.

Overall the 40’s was a great era for cartoons, the unique styles of Chuck Jones, Clampett & Avery blossomed, Lantz was at his peak & even Famous had some pretty good output.

Write a comment.





Comment: